James Sturm at App State

[With the deadline for Midnight Sun #3 looming over my head like the proverbial sword of Damocles throughout the tail end of ‘06, I’ve only now had a few moments to write about my excursion up to Appalachian State University to hear a presentation given by cartoonist (and friend) James Sturm.]

It was dark, raining and generally miserable on the evening of November 30th when I set out up the mountain towards Boone, N.C., home of App State, as it’s called colloquially in these parts. Among the things I most dislike in the arena of driving are: driving in the mountains, driving in the dark, and driving in the rain—and yet, I was having a pretty enjoyable trip, thanks to newly added PART bus route by means of which which one can travel from Winston-Salem to Boone for the low price of eight measly dollars. Every once in a while I’d give a maniacal laugh as I glanced out the window of this brand spanking new bus at the poor rubes in passing cars pulling their hair out trying to drive in the maelstrom; I, meanwhile, was drawing in my sketchbook.

After a delicious meal at the local hippy-ass vegetarian restaurant (can’t remember the name of the place, but it’s really good), I wandered with a friend into the University’s Plemmons Student Union hoping someone there could guide me to wherever the talk would be going on. I didn’t need to look far, though; a sandwichboard in the main hallway had the full skinny on Sturm’s talk. Well… not Sturm’s talk exactly, but close enough: “James Saturn,” it said, would be speaking in the Table Rock Room. How does “Sturm” get transmogrified into “Saturn?” Who knows—maybe FEMA’s Michael Brown has got a new gig at the App State student union. Needless to say, James was henceforth referred to as “Jimmy Saturn” throughout his visit.

Sturm was at the school as a part of the Hughlene Bostian Frank Visiting Writers Series and had been invited by professor Craig Fischer, who teaches a comics and graphic novels class there. By the time Craig had stepped to the podium to introduce James, the room was pretty well packed. As I said, it was a while back that this all occurred, but I took a few notes while there… so, what follows is what James Sturm discussed, as best as I recall, along with a few sample pages from his forthcoming graphic novel that he was kind enough to forward to me for purposes of this essay:

Sturm (For consistency’s sake, I’ll refer to him as “Sturm” throughout, despite the fact that this seems somewhat stuffy—and kinda nerdy, in a sort of “I prefer Buscema’s Silver Surfer to Kirby’s” way) began by discussing the work he’s probably best known for, The Golem’s Mighty Swing. He mentioned what he considered to be some of the themes he sought to address throughout, specifically the societal roles of media and identity. In reference to the latter he highlighted the metaphoric parallels between the sport of baseball and Judaism—shared by both the fictional “Stars of David” baseball team from the book and by the author himself—mentioning the analogous goals of “returning home” shared by the two, and the less obvious wandering Jew/barnstorming ball team counterparts. The pages from the book that he showed to accompany this section really struck me in a way that I didn’t recall them doing when I last read the book. I don’t know whether this was just the impact of seeing them projected at such a large scale, or maybe due to the printing of the book itself, these images being presumably the master files from which the book was printed rather than scans of the finished book. I own a first printing of the book and seem to recall Sturm having some misgivings about the way the halftoned grays in the book turned out when it was first published. (I was a student at the Savannah College of Art and Design when Sturm taught there, which was around the time the book was released.)

Sturm then briefly discussed his influences, citing Harvey Krurtzman in particular. Things he mentioned specifically about Kurtzman were his (Kurtzman’s) consideration of the page as a single unit, the idea of each tier on a page as a “sentence,” and the use of darks and lights of his backgrounds. I was a bit surprised to hear Kurtzman cited here since I’ve known Sturm for a while and can’t recall Kurtzman ever coming up in conversation. Kurtzman in one of my “top three” so I’m sure as heck not protesting the choice, though—and I wonder if maybe Sturm’s recent move into the role of graphic novel director/editor for the Center for Cartoon Studies-produced graphic novel biography series—a role so much like that which Kurtzman played throughout the latter part of his career—hadn’t brought him a newfound interest in and appreciation for Kurtzman’s work.

The next topic up was Sturm’s 2004 Fantastic Four mini-series, Unstable Molecules, which he wrote for Marvel Comics—his sole outing into the world of “mainstream” comics. He cited his interest in both the X-Men and the Fantastic Four as a youngster and mentioned the FF’s soap opera-like nature as something that contributed to the book’s appeal. The particular jumping off point for Unstable Molecules, though, was apparently a line in Kerouac’s On The Road in which the Kerouac refers to people—the “mad ones,” as he says—who, “burn, burn, burn, like fabulous yellow roman candles exploding like spiders across the stars.” Fifties beat culture was of course featured prominently throughout Unstable Molecules and the Human Torch imagery evoked by the quote above seems strangely fitting given the era in which the Fantastic Four first appeared. Sturm half-jokingly recalled that throughout the project, the powers-that-be at Marvel kept asking, “When are they going to get their powers?” His response, simply: “They’re not.”

Sturm then discussed the more general formal considerations of the comics art form that have been shaping his newest work, a 250 page (or thereabouts) graphic novel set in an art school. He discussed first the oft-repeated Chris Ware/Scott McCloud school of comics aesthetics in which the language of comics is purported to be a visual language which communicates via a semi-shared language of abstract formal shapes. As such, it’s assumed, the art form best performs its duty of pictorial allusion with a simple visual vocabulary exemplified by work such as Schulz’s Peanuts. Sturm admitted, though, to be at the same time “seduced by the beauty of the illustrative image,” citing an admiration for artists like Thomas Hart Benton (whose influence on Sturm is readily apparent in his work to-date) and New Yorker cartoonist, Whitney Darrow, Jr.

Seeking an aesthetic of rich textured surface similar to Darrow’s, Sturm began working on his new book using the laborious methods Darrow utilized to get his rich, exquisitely composed gag cartoons. Sturm showed a page or two of his book done in this style—black and white with lots of loose marks that appeared to be dry brush, charcoal, litho crayon or the like. Sturm, though, quickly realized that this method—which yielded Darrow a single gag panel per three-week period—was not well-suited for the production of a long-form comics work, and he changed gears, reverting back to the duotone style familiar to readers of his previous work, The Golem’s Mighty Swing. He showed a page from the new book done in this fashion as well. Ultimately, though, Sturm decided that this Roy Crane-ish style wasn’t appropriate for the narrative at hand and that it really demanded what he referred to as a “candy coated” palate. The final results you can see below:

3s.png

11s.png

Sturm finished his presentation with an demonstration of his work process, using a single panel as an example and showing its progression from thumbnail through to completion. Narrating that here wouldn’t make much sense without the visuals, but my general observation was that his process is as exacting and particular as what I saw of his in-progress work on Golem when I was a student of his in Savannah, but that now substantially more of that work is being done digitally.

A final note of interest to potential Sturm fans is that one item he showed during his presentation was endpapers for a forthcoming collection, James Sturm’s America, presumably to be published by Drawn & Quarterly, that will collect Revival, Hundreds of Feet Below Daylight and The Golem’s Mighty Swing in a single hardbound edition. While I chided him later over drinks for “milking” these stories, since the former two of those books had already recently been reissued as Above and Below by D&Q, in all likelihood, I’ll probably wind up buying the damn thing and James—A.K.A. “Jimmy Saturn”—will have the last laugh.

SPXpo.com Updated w/ 2007 Dates

SPX | The Small Press Expo

I hereby recant my good-natured ribbing of the SPX website’s heretofore now sluggish updating schedule; the dates for this year’s show are indeed now up on the site–and announced also is the first guest, Jeff Smith.  Good news right out of the gate, I say.

Igor the Cowboy – Pg. 1

I decided to ditch the “Al Columbia” approach I was playing with a few posts ago for a couple of reasons: One, it’d have involved a ton of work to paint all the required backgrounds. I thought about trying to modify the story a bit so I could maybe get away with just two background/settings, but ultimately didn’t. Two, it just didn’t make a whole lot of sense. The strip’s supposed to be from an old comic book, and–as cool as that Fleisher animation stuff looks–it’s not printed comics, it’s animation. Anyway, here’s page one drawn in a more appropriate and less labor-intensive “bigfoot” style:

igor_1.png

SPX 2007

I’m on the SPX mailing list and just received an email about the dates for the 2007 event, including registration dates. The SPX website is known far and wide for its “slow as molasses in (pre-global warming) January” update schedule, so for purposes of Google indexing, I’ll post the announcement here (although the email claimed the site would be updated this week):

SPX has announced that their 2007 show will be held October 12-13 at the Marriott Bethesda North Hotel & Conference Center.

Exhibitor Registration for SPX 2007 will open on January 21, 2007. Forms will be available for download at the web site www.spxpo.com at that time.

First and foremost, note that the event will again be held at the expensive and ill-located Marriott “Bethesda” in Rockville. This was pretty much a foregone conclusion of course, not just because last year’s show was a success, but if what I overheard via my extremely rude eavesdropping at last year’s event is to be believed, the Marriott was pleased with attendance, room bookings, etc. And, location and expense aside, it really is a much nicer hotel and the general consensus on the “big room” seems to be positive.

The note, from new Executive Director, Karon Flage, also included this interesting tidbit: “I don’t plan on making any major changes in the show structure in my first year of running the show…” This is a direct reference to an online survey that exhibitors at last year’s show were asked to fill out, but one can maybe read a bit into it given some of the questions asked. Thankfully the survey is still online–and since the original email was still in my gmail account, I went back and refreshed my memory on it. Here are a few questions from which one might deduce some of the changes that were perhaps under consideration, but which are apparently not in the works for SPX 2007–a few stand out:

Q) Would you like to see a larger show with more exhibitors?

A) Yes / No / Yes, if it keeps tables prices down

…and…

Q) Would you like to see SPX move to a Saturday/Sunday show? (Note: The Ignatz Ceremony will always be held the second night of the show. As a festival award, voting must be available both days of the show.)

A) Yes / No / Yes if exhibitor setup was available Friday night instead of early Saturday morning.

The latter question of a possible day shift has clearly been ditched–the 12 & 13th of October are a Friday/Saturday. As to the former, my guess here–and of course this is all exactly that–is that, despite much talk of potentially adding more space to the “floor” and perhaps letting volume bring down the per-table exhibitor price–this has likewise been shelved.

The survey also contained a few questions about two acknowledged problem areas of last year’s show:

Q) Did you attend the Ignatz Ceremony this year?

A) Yes / No / I wanted to but couldn’t get in

…and…

Q) Did you attend the Sunday exhibitor programming (the Small Press Summit)?

A) Yes / No / No, I didn’t know about it /No, the topics did not appeal to me

Regarding these items–the overcrowded Ignatz ceremony, and the lack of any real information about Sunday programming–I’d hazard a guess that they don’t fall under the heading of “major changes.” The fact that they were on the survey indicates to me that the powers that be are aware of these relatively minor problems and will likely do something to attempt to remedy them, although I’m not sure what to make of the fact that the announced dates of the show don’t include Sunday the 14th. On the one hand, if promotion of Sunday programming is a recognized problem, it’s hard to imagine that they’d neglect to include the date as a part of the show’s announced schedule. On the other hand, they didn’t include the day last year on the website, etc. and there was (supposedly) Sunday programming then.

Personally, yeah, I’m gonna go. I’ve gone to this event for the last four years or so and SPX is really the only East Coast indy-friendly show that I can afford to attend (MoCCA being out for that reason)… particularly now that the “Indy Island” portion of Charlotte N.C.’s Heroes Con seems to be no more is perhaps in doubt, given the departure of Heroes “indy guy” Dustin Harbin.

After every convention season, I usually make a “vow” of the, “Next year I’m gonna…” format. In past years it’s been to get a cell phone, buy a laptop, get one of those rolly cart things, etc. Last year’s vow for this year’s season: I will get takeout or delivery and eat dinner at SPX in my hotel room. 100% of my dinner experiences last year involved some sort of trauma: overpriced mediocre food at the hotel restaurant, a lengthy freezing hike down the Rockville Pike, restaurants with an hour and a half wait time to get seated, missed Ignatz ceremony because of slow service, etc. Pizza Hut, here I come!

Igor the Cowboy

Before I get back rolling on the remainder of Midnight Sun, I’m going to be doing two pages of artwork for Chris Reilly’s next Igor book. It’s the sequel to 2006’s The Trouble with Igor, and its title is, I believe, Igor: Repaired by Frankensteins (both by Slave Labor Graphics). The art for both of these books is by Gus Fink, but the new book calls for a two page vintage “Igor the Cowboy” story to be drawn in a different style. I just started messing around with Igor’s look last night and here’s what I’ve got so far. To further the effect, I’ve placed the character on a cool old Fleischer Studios animation background from Popeye. This of course makes no sense whatsoever, but I thought it looked kinda neat:

igor_1.jpg